For me it stopped me plenty of times.

You need to share the schadenfreude with the rest of us, brother.

Unfortunately that’s not how it works. Once you have a sufficiently large userbase, the network effects are enough to sustain them. A ton of people use facebook still and that has been a logged-in experience forever. Same with instagram.

Not only do I run and share it. I’ve built an entire service to allow everyone else to do so safely. https://aihorde.net/

However it generates only a fraction of the traffic that would otherwise reach twitter, and also makes it useless as it cannot be data harvested.

They are dead serious though.

People will pretend they still live in a rules-based order until jackboots start breaking down their own door.

They didn’t “freak out”. This is clearly a retaliation for anthropic daring to oppose them earlier this year

That line is actually a quote from “Red” Emma Goldman.

Ah that wasn’t there when I deployed it.

What do you mean? Where does it do it’s own detection?

My point is, even a racist bridge has uses as a bridge. The solution is not to tear down the bridge, it’s to address the systematic racism. Likewise with GenAI tech, we are not involved in making it, nor do we promote that the way it was created was correct. We just say that people using it are not necessarily reinforcing the problem, anymore than a random pedestrian crossing that bridge would be reinforcing racism.

Yes, the way the tech was created and is being used, is problematic; an imperfect creation of a deeply flawed system. I’m not disputing that. I’m disputing that any and all uses of an imperfect creation are by necessity “fascist”

I feel the author routinelly conflates technology with technological implementations to make their point. For example, they conflate surveillance, with camera equipment and they conflate bridges, with city planning. What me and others are pointing out, is that we’re not hostile to GenAI as the technology (like cameras, bridges) but we’re absolutely against the popular (i.e. corporate) GenAI implementations.

I feel there’s no harm whatsoever to use GenAI to personal gratification. Games, Porn, Shortcuts on boring but known tasks etc. But there’s absolutely harm to using corporate AI to do so, and there’s absolutely harm in using it for purposes outside of it (facts, propaganda, agents etc)

And yes, any technology built in capitalist systems, will be inevitably corrupted from its inception from those systems. This is not exclusive to GenAI as a technology however.

We don’t consider that.

Yeah, “the wishes of the creator” don’t matter. They don’t get to dictate how people use an idea they’ve shared, no matter how elaborate. If they want to keep it private, then don’t share it.

Iocaine expects you know how to detect it the bots, if they can get past anubis do you have another detection process?

It’s free, but you need to be contributing models and stuff to get a lot of usage, although the monthly free amount is plenty for basic usage

The bambulabs generator, particularly with the hunuan 3.0 model is really good. I’m using it for custom boardgame minis.

I mean, there’s some things that became validly toxic due to their developers, example off the top of my head: Reiserfs

Am I out of the loop? what’s wrong with zsh?