They gave him more specifics and now he’s whining because they took 3 weeks for that. Hmmm.

clean-room recreation, […] It is meant to act as a defense against copyright claims because it shows nothing was copied.

Patents work differently than copyrights. But that’s the basics. Didn’t that guy know even the basics?

Synaptics took about three weeks to answer his request for specifics,

Also, the attitude of “you didn’t tell it all with spoon feeding details, so I’m just going to ignore you” doesn’t work.

In theory, they would not even need to tell the specific details in advance about which part of the work violates which patent. they could wait until the court case with revealing this. Patents are public. Everybody can read them and know what it is what he cannot do without asking the patent owner.

An appendix listed over 125 patents without saying which

On the other hand, the whole patent system is rotten and nearly unusable with the huge numbers of teeny tiny patents nowadays, where most of them should never have been granted at all.

TIL this scheme is also called a honeypot

That’s only… roughly… not even 1 TB.
BLOODY ROOKIE!

/s

Have you considered a trip to India?

Its not really bashing if it’s true

So I’ve never had a true chance to bash trump? 😰

It’s not that easy. Running the thing over is also dangerous for the people in the bus. The driver must decide.

It was to expect.

Someone was bound to introduce some “AI slop” & “Vibe coding” bashing into this case — true or not.

What took them so long?

most US ecomical leaders are sleeping

Isn’t there an e too much?

(Greetings from Sigmund)

I’d rather try a net made of wire cables.

It’s because his dress is still 10 times more expensive.

Why would a personal blog have stocks anyway?

He is anything else than stupid. Actually dangerous (unless they finally stop throwing insane amounts of money at him year after year)

The era of “Trump says” over, finally?

Are we in “Altman says” for the next five years?

Make that 500 or maybe more…

Everyone, forever.

That’s why it was M$ now. They go for trvial.

False accusation is one of the more difficult things to write laws for, because it’s very difficult to prove.

But you make it unnecessarily difficult by mixing up the definition itself and the questions of proof.

False accusation isn’t a crime over there?
What a shitty place!

They will counter with “if we don’t use them, we’ll be leaving ourselves open to enemies who will.”

Stupid.

That argument “works” only if you have already distanced yourself from all sane and sensible principles, like the ones I have quoted.

Or, in “Star Wars” words: if you belong to the dark side :)

humans “have the responsibility

Machines are tools, not persons

No machine should ever choose to take the life of a human being

I say these are wise words.