“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: […] like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.” —Jonathan Swift

  • 3 Posts
  • 205 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2024

help-circle






  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldtolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•Repost.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This was not from 2013. This screenshot was provably from 2021, specifically anywhere from January 17th to March 27th. The FreeBSD Foundation celebrated its 20th anniversary in 2020 (press release from December 21st, 2020, here). The person who said it was from 2013 wrongly assumed that the logo (upper-left of the screenshot) was referencing the 20th anniversary of FreeBSD itself and not the FreeBSD Foundation.

    The reason it’s so low is that 1) this is kept track of throughout the year, and 2) it was a matched donation or donations. Thus, Apple matched donations throughout the year, eventually amounting to $1000–4999, but at the point this screenshot was taken (early in the year), they were only between $5–24.

    Please read my comment below explaining this. You’ve accidentally edited more misinformation into your comment in trying to be more thorough.


  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldtolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•Repost.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It was likely a matched donation. See my comment below explaining how this screenshot came to be (the screenshot is real and was taken sometime between mid-January to late March 2021) and @RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip’s comment showing the donation policy.

    The comment by @Morphit@feddit.uk below is wrong and isn’t even examining the relevant years (although it does correctly explore the spirit of the original post, which is that this is chump change for Apple regardless).





  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldtolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•Repost.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Edit 3: This is not edited but rather a real screenshot from early 2021.

    • Alexander Tharapos only shows up in 2021. David Choi is also in the $5–24 bracket.
    • Donations accrue throughout the year. Here’s one snapshot from late March 2021 showing Apple far below where they were at year’s end.
    • The FreeBSD Foundation’s 20th anniversary was in 2020, hence the logo.
    • However, this was after mid-January, as we have an archive from then when Apple Inc. wasn’t on the donor list yet.
    • Apple was in the $1000–$4999 range by year’s end.

    This also comports with @RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip’s note about the donation matching program. A small automatic donation like this would make sense.


    What’s more likely?

    • Apple, Inc. noticed and went out of their way to donate – but an amount so inconsequential that it damages their brand image and probably, due to labor overhead, cost them more to donate than the amount actually donated.
    • You can donate under whatever name you want, and someone just made their name “Apple Inc.” as a joke.

    Edit: I checked the donors, and while I couldn’t go back farther than 2024 (even by changing the URL param), none of them were $5–24.


    Edit 2: I went back to 2018 via the Wayback Machine and still couldn’t find this. I guess it’s possible it happened before this, but given every single year seems to be in the hundreds to thousands range and given a $25 donation by a company like Apple would be pissing money into the void, this seems dubious.



  • The parties that discovered CVE-2026-97631—Alex Matrosov of Anthropic and Dan Holmes of Google—had arranged for it to stay under wraps until a coordinated disclosure that was scheduled for January. AMI, a maker of motherboards and other hardware, published this pull request last month that detailed the vulnerability and included a code fix. Once the post came to the attention of the discovering parties, TianoCore Project members published a public advisory last week.

    Hot take: botched disclosures like this should open a company to criminal liability. We need to start treating SWE with the same level of scrutiny we do other engineering fields and not “oopsie poopsie, I accidentally just disclosed an attack that endangers global infrastructure.”

    Edit: Also, just of fucking course it’s a buffer overflow in C code. “No way to prevent this, says only nation where this regularly happens” vibes.






  • Active functioning search engine website “OFFICIAL LAUNCHES” - Google: August 1998 Yandex: 23 September 1997

    What on Earth is this link supposed to show? Did you just expect that nobody would check it?

    In August 1998, Sun co-founder Andy Bechtolsheim wrote Larry and Sergey a check for $100,000, and Google Inc. was officially born. With this investment, the newly incorporated team made the upgrade from the dorms to their first office: a garage in suburban Menlo Park, California, owned by Susan Wojcicki (employee #16 and former CEO of YouTube). Clunky desktop computers, a ping pong table, and bright blue carpet set the scene for those early days and late nights.

    This once again establishes that Google Inc. came about in August 1998, not that Google Search did. Google Search existed in 1997; it was a registered, functioning website with a web search engine.


    Edit: Huh, I see it’s a bit more complicated. Google Search was available at google.stanford.edu during 1997. Which is still a functioning domain that uses Google Search to index the web.


    Edit 2: Unrelated to this, the fact the first version of the Google logo was created in GIMP is so quaint. TIL



  • Double nope.

    Google was officially launched in 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin to market Google Search, [emphasis mine] which has become the most used web-based search engine.

    Google Search had already existed since the domain was registered. (EDIT: See comments below. I don’t know that this is true. It seems google.stanford.edu was up as a functioning web search engine in 1997, but this is getting murky.) You’re talking about Google Inc. the company which was created in 1998. Google Search was launched in 1997.

    However, by that comparison, it’s vastly less close, as Yandex LLC was first legally registered 14 September 2000.


    TL;DR: You were comparing apples to oranges.

    Search website:

    • Google: 15 September 1997
    • Yandex: 23 September 1997

    Legally registered company:

    • Google Inc.: 1998
    • Yandex LLC: 14 September 2000

    Edit: And to clarify, I think the sensible metric here, that works in Yandex’s favor by bringing the two within eight days of each other instead of approximately two years, is to use the date their search engine websites launched and were functioning, not when they filed paperwork that said “We’re legally a company now 🥳”.