I think Hyundai/Kia have relatively unintrusive driver assistance systems (so far).
I’ve driven a VW Golf that almost got me killed when the “smart” cruise control slammed on the brakes to “avoid” a car in the turning lane and a mate drives an Amarok that nags him to rest every few minutes because it doesn’t like the shape of his eyes.
Government tipping the scales to help their capitalist mates seems to be exactly how capitalism works.
Tyre insert fad has been and gone over the last few years. There are a shitload of options, not just cushcore.
Decent tyres are better than an inadequate tyre with something stuffed inside.
Dirt bikes are so much faster, heavier and powerful that comparisons with mountain bikes are mostly unhelpful.
Do you understand that the whole point of self driving cars is to not have humans with eyes and depth perception doing the driving?
Computers can’t even reliably differentiate between B and 8.
We use “cameras” for object detection
lol
My kid tried to drive it into a hedge and it wouldn’t let them. Not the same as accelerating from across the road at a house but also the car makes no self driving claims.
if you point it at a house and floor the accelerator from a few hundred meters away?
I don’t know for sure and I can’t think of a good way to test. It certainly wouldn’t hit it when “driving itself” with smart cruise control or if I tried to drive into it from a few metres away.
If your misunderstanding of how a machine works is that fundamental I don’t think there’s a reason to continue this.
The same applies to stopping it from driving full speed into a house.
It really really really doesn’t
I want vehicles that rely on cameras for detecting obstacles to be banned.
Anything that uses reasonable object detection methods should be banned if it lets you drive into a house. My Kia won’t let me drive into a house.
Doesn’t that make it waaaaaaaay easier?
This (actually Ubuntu when it was still mostly Debian) is why I am using Tumbleweed now.
Small upgrades often seems to work more reliably for me.
“10 athletes” seems to be the bit you’re missing.
Nah ion thrusters are way more likely to be useful for human travel because they are supposed to thrust constantly. Chemical rockets thrust for minutes, not months.
It’s only faster because they took space and staff from actual checkouts.