I switched to octopi launcher

This is nonsense, just because someone uses the same tool as you do, does not mean that you support it.

Quite possible, but my bet is that they will buy the winners, just like after dotcom

They don’t pay that much tax to where I am from, so if the US wants to do so, have fun.

Yes, but I don’t see floods of users switching to better privacy options any time soon

I don’t see how Google would willingly get rid of the goodwill and data of normal users like that. Most people don’t know about the sheer site of Googles ad revenue. Also, Google will be the player that shows ads in Google answers, so the moat for ads will become bigger instead of smaller in my mind. Do you have a source on Google ads dying? Last I heard was that it was very profitable for alphabet.

Google and Microsoft are profitable without ai. So I’d assume the bubble popping will not crash them

And open models regularly have versions released that remove these restrictions. Qwen won’t answer any questions June 1989 in Tianmen square, but the unrestricted version does.

Exactly why it needs code to enforce repetitive results.

Someone put in the intro to the book Frankenstein into an ai checker and it confirmed it to be 100 percent written by an LLM. It’s not deterministic.

Asahi kinda works, but only up to m2/m3. Apple isn’t very helpful with Linux support.

Don’t step on snek

Do you mean LLMs can find new bug classes or new bugs?

Regulated by whom? You can’t really stop someone from making tensors and scraping the web. The only good way I could see it happen would be the US enforcing it’s embargo powers, but that cat is out of the bag. I don’t see how countries like China would accept it and I also do not foresee the US trying the entire rest of the world to agree to a trade embargo with China either. Especially nowadays where the US showed multiple times that they are an unreliable partner. Even open local models are strong enough to probably scrape stuff on their own.

The funny thing to me is that Lemmy users seem to be so staunchly against LLMs, that they are unable to even acknowledge the small things it truly is good for as a tool. It’s like the opposite of hackernews on here.

Lemmy would need to be less niche and discoverability of subs needs to be better I’d say. Otherwise it’s fine already.

Splitting gas diesel and hybrids is misleading in this stat. Once EV beats all of the above, true progress is on the horizon.

Of course not. But saying an entire framework is bad is silly. That is my entire point. Thanks for agreeing with me.

Native what? AoT compiled dotnet code? Bad C++ code?

Compares to what? Electron apps or ffmpeg level of assembler?