Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
@Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
@Natanael@infosec.pub
@Natanael@lemmy.zip
Lemmy moderation account: @TrustedThirdParty@infosec.pub - !crypto@infosec.pub
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social
If you have one well moderated forum for normal users and a shit one nobody goes to, the bots will show up at the latter.
If the AI review function doesn’t tell the difference, the bombardment of fakes in the second will tilt review summaries significantly
Depends on the coworkers. Some does, some gets in over their head.
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/sam-altman-hates-local-ai-models-computers
The RAM price jumps hurts smartphone prices too. Several models have basically no upgrades from the last year’s generation (see: Pixel) because of it.
ESP32 started in the segment far below and moving up to match
So do I!
The GrapheneOS people are using CPU level hardware security functions provided by Qualcomm, I’m assuming the partnership means they get proper access to drivers and Motorola / Lenovo won’t be modifying the CPU.
Now there’s still plenty of room for shenanigans in other places like the modem and various interconnects and the motherboard and all that, but at least there’s some baseline security provided there using ARM secure boot and hardware level exploit protection in the CPU, etc.
How about don’t present partial matches, demand more data first to raise certainty of the results. Especially partial matches against open ended data sets is wildly unsafe in almost every case (eg. not already having suspects).
Responsible presentation is sometimes not at all, if the user isn’t an expert.
Copyright generally requires human expression regardless of what the type of work is, it’s not about what you were inspired by
If you did derive your work from something else and yours is similar enough, then now both you and the original author has separate copyrights on the result which both needs to be licensed to sell the work (prime example is book translations)
Uneducation camps
Evil genies
The problem is as usual that they violate everybody’s expectations as they make the change…
If continuity isn’t relevant for qualia, then LLMs could have perpetually incomplete perception like the edge of the image drawn on a CRT screen when captured at high frame rates. You never see a complete picture even if it’s technically represented.
The debate on consciousness are on par with Copenhagen interpretation versus pilot wave versus multiple words - except the underlying theory they’re trying to describe is also not well defined
We can only practically describe subsets of what’s required for some basic functions, and we can describe a bunch of chemistry, some brain activation patterns, etc. But nobody can tie that together to why we feel what we feel (and some don’t agree that qualia is real, that perception itself is an illusion)
Hidden malicious behavior is the bigger risk, but if you did your job with sandboxing it (lol, lmao) that’s not a big risk
The biggest problem isn’t cost of running the models right now, the biggest problem is all the debt they built up on training and data center buildouts. That’s what they need to recoup and that’s what’s going to drive prices up. And once it’s recouped they’ll need to make pure profits.
And I hope that debt kills them because all the big AI companies are terrible in one way or another, and the eventual price disparity will make it uneconomical to use their models. Then we might return right back to development focusing on small models, not large ones.
Yeah so they need to present some basic evidence, not just an accusation
Not valid unless it was a crime in the country the request is filed to. There’s no “they asked so we had to”
Hardened systems with hardware enforced isolation (virtualization and stuff)
If there’s no traffic jams, you’re free to drive however much it want
If there’s traffic jams, the more trucks your company have in traffic the lower priority you get for them. That gives everybody access because those with the most trucks can take some off the street to raise the priority for the others a bit, and that in turn gives room to others